Genealogy

Dr. McDonald Analyzes Dad’s Data

DADBGA1

DADBGA2

Most likely fit is 73.3% (+- 0.4%) America (all Native (Central) American)

and 5.9% (+- 0.9%) Africa (various subcontinents)

and 17.4% (+- 0.7%) Europe (various subcontinents)

and 3.3% (+- 0.3%) E. Asia (various subcontinents)

The following are possible population sets and their fractions, most likely at the top

Maya= 0.728 Maasai= 0.058 French= 0.180 Chukchi= 0.035 or

Maya= 0.736 Maasai= 0.056 French= 0.177 Yakut= 0.031 or

Maya= 0.728 O-Ethiop= 0.070 French= 0.167 Chukchi= 0.035 or

Maya= 0.737 O-Ethiop= 0.068 French= 0.165 Yakut= 0.030 or

Maya= 0.735 Maasai= 0.057 French= 0.170 Altai= 0.039 or

Maya= 0.736 Maasai= 0.057 French= 0.176 Buryat= 0.032 or

Maya= 0.736 Maasai= 0.056 Romania= 0.182 Yakut= 0.027 or

Maya= 0.738 Mandenka= 0.042 Spain= 0.188 Yakut= 0.033 or

Maya= 0.736 Maasai= 0.057 French= 0.173 MongolaC= 0.035 or

Maya= 0.727 O-Ethiop= 0.074 English= 0.164 Chukchi= 0.036

or, better, a custom fit as

English 0.1492 Moroccan 0.0985 Columbian 0.0456 Maya 0.5841 Pima 0.1226 or

French 0.1490 Moroccan 0.0978 Columbian 0.0482 Maya 0.5822 Pima 0.1228 or

Spain 0.1506 Moroccan 0.0942 Columbian 0.0475 Maya 0.5849 Pima 0.1227

The Native American in this is generic Central-North American/Caribbean, clearly not

the more common (in people I see) plain Mayan from Guatemala/Mexico. Also,

Spain really is a third choice to more northerly Western European.

Advertisements

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s